Sorting Sortase Substrates - Exploring the bioconjugation capabilities of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> transpeptidase sortase A — ASN Events

Sorting Sortase Substrates - Exploring the bioconjugation capabilities of Staphylococcus aureus transpeptidase sortase A (#116)

Matthias Nachtschatt 1 2 , Charlotte Williams 2 , Randy Suryadinata 2 , Stewart Nuttall 2 , Quentin Churches 2 , Tim Adams 2 , Georg Pohnert 1
  1. Inorganic and analytical chemistry, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
  2. CSIRO, Parkville, VIC, Australia

Bioorthogonal, chemoselective ligation methods are highly valuable to investigate biochemical pathways and to modify proteins and peptides for biomedical applications. The Staphylococcus aureus transpeptidase sortase A (SaSrtA) has been widely established for bioconjugation due to the mild conditions and high selectivity of the enzymatic reaction. Published applications include protein labelling, anti-body modification, cyclization of proteins and peptides and cell surface modification [1]. SaSrtA recognises the canonical LPXTG pentapeptide motif of its first proteinogenic substrate and conjugates it to an N-terminal polyglycine containing second substrate (acyl-acceptor substrate, AAS). Firstly, sortase A binds to the acetyl group of threonine, cleaving off the terminal glycine by forming a thioester intermediate. Secondly the N-terminal amine of the acyl-acceptor substrate releases the sortase by forming a new amide bond with the acyl group of threonine [2]. While the structure-function relation of the first substrate and the enzyme is well reported and crystal structures with bound intermediate are available, recognition and binding of the acyl-acceptor substrate is hitherto not described [3].

Here we report the successful design and employment of a variety of SaSrtA AAS variants to determine the minimal necessary properties of the N-terminal functional group of the second sortase substrate for optimization of the SaSrtA bioconjugation method.

  1. Ritzefeld et. al., Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 8516-8529
  2. Hung Ton-That,et. al.; PNAS, 1999, 96(22):12424–12429
  3. Suree et al., J.Biol.Chem., 2008, 284, 24465-24477